Local business directories have long been a foundational pillar of digital presence. But in 2025, the landscape has shifted dramatically. SaaS marketing providers managing multi-location brands must now ask: are data aggregators still worth the investment?
This article takes a technical look at how aggregators have evolved, what role they play today, and whether direct-to-publisher APIs and syndication networks now offer better alternatives for maintaining accurate, consistent, and timely business listings at scale.
The Original Role of Aggregators
Data aggregators like Neustar Localeze, Data Axle (formerly Infogroup), and Factual rose to prominence in the early 2010s. Their job was straightforward: collect business data and distribute it across a wide range of directories, maps, apps, and platforms.
In theory, using an aggregator meant:
- Wide-reaching syndication across dozens (or hundreds) of platforms
- Simplified data maintenance through a single source of truth
- Enhanced SEO via consistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone) information
For single-location businesses, this “fire-and-forget” model offered value. For multi-location enterprises, however, cracks began to show—particularly as search engines evolved.
Why Data Aggregators Are Losing Steam
1. Latency and Control
Data aggregators operate on batch cycles, not real-time syncs. This can introduce delays of weeks or even months before updates propagate. For multi-location brands that manage 100+ locations, this lag becomes a liability, especially during rebrands, relocations, or urgent updates (e.g., holiday hours, health closures).
Furthermore, SaaS platforms have limited visibility into where the data is going, how often it’s being updated, or how conflicts are resolved when data from different sources compete.
2. Algorithmic Shifts
Google, Apple, Bing, and other major platforms no longer rely solely on aggregators. Instead, they increasingly favor:
- Direct integrations (e.g., APIs or partnerships)
- First-party data submissions
- Verified sources and structured data on websites
This reduces the influence of traditional syndication models and puts pressure on SaaS providers to establish direct control over each touchpoint.
3. Duplicate Risk and Conflict Resolution
Aggregator-based models can introduce or perpetuate duplicates, especially if data is merged from multiple uncoordinated sources. Once a listing becomes fractured, it requires manual or API-based deduplication to resolve, a task that legacy data aggregators rarely handle well at scale. Realistically these data providers are often paid per record. Little motivation exists for them to remove duplicate or old business data.
The Modern User Moves Faster
The biggest shift in 2025 is both technical and behavioral. The small business owners and SaaS marketers now expect tools that deliver results in minutes or days and not quarters.
Modern listing platforms powered by APIs give users the ability to:
- See real-time status updates
- Get immediate validation errors
- Push changes and verify publication within a week or less
In contrast, aggregator systems still rely on cascading relationships. After submitting to the aggregator, you wait for their next batch cycle. Then you wait for downstream publishers to accept, process, and finally publish the data. This process is opaque, inconsistent, and far too slow for today’s digital velocity.
In short, today’s users demand speed and visibility, and aggregators weren’t built for that.
How Direct-to-Publisher APIs Are Taking Over
Modern listings APIs like the one offered by Local Data Exchange allow for direct, programmatic control over publishing, editing, and monitoring listings across high-value publishers.
Benefits for SaaS Marketing Providers:
- Real-Time Updates: Push updates instantly and avoid waiting for batch cycles.
- Full Control: Maintain consistency across all listings without interference from third-party data.
- Error Management: Detect rejected submissions and troubleshoot format issues directly, rather than waiting for a vague aggregator report.
- Custom Workflows: Integrate updates into your own platforms via RESTful APIs, automate change detection, and scale as your client base grows.
These features aren’t just “nice to have”, they’re critical for serving multi-location brands that demand agility and insight.
Are Aggregators Still Useful for Anything?
Yes, but narrowly. They’re still helpful for:
- Long-tail reach: If you want to be listed on lesser-known directories or niche apps that don’t support APIs.
- “Set it and forget it” SMBs: For small, low-maintenance businesses, the simplicity of aggregator feeds can still provide a decent but slow ROI.
- Backfill support: Some platforms still consume data from aggregators indirectly (e.g., via licensing partnerships).
However, relying exclusively on aggregators in 2025 is a strategic weakness for SaaS providers. They should be considered a secondary tool, not a primary listings method.
Modern Listings Architecture for Multi-Location Brands
Here’s what a modern, API-first local presence strategy should look like:
1. Direct API Connections
Use direct integrations with publishers like Apple Maps, Bing Places, Yelp, and Foursquare.
2. Dynamic Data Source
Maintain a centralized database of all business attributes and metadata, validated by both humans and automated QA systems.
3. Syndication Visibility
Track submission status, publisher feedback, and live listings, ideally with webhook-based reporting or polling endpoints.
4. Fallback Aggregators (Optional)
If used, data aggregators should only supplement coverage, not serve as the core distribution method.
5. Verification Infrastructure
Automate verification where possible, or build customer workflows to support phone/text/postcard verification when required.
What This Means for SaaS Providers
If you’re building software for multi-location brands, your clients expect:
- Speed: Real-time or near-real-time listing updates
- Reliability: Complete audit trails and change logs
- Transparency: Visibility into where and how data is published
- Customization: Control over how listings appear, what fields are editable, and where automation is possible
How AI May Disrupt Listings Even Further
The evolution doesn’t stop with APIs. AI-driven search platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and others are rewriting the rules of business discovery. These models often bypass traditional directories and crawl their own structured sources, looking for:
- Verified location data
- Real-time updates
- First-party signals embedded in structured data formats (like JSON-LD)
- Aggregated sentiment from reviews and local context
If your listings data isn’t structured, verified, and accessible via programmatic means, you may be invisible to AI search altogether. SaaS providers must adapt by:
- Centralizing control of business data
- Publishing structured schema markup directly
- Using APIs like those from Local Data Exchange to push updates instantly and keep pace with AI indexing behavior
- Offering clients insights into not just where they’re listed, but how they’re being interpreted by modern AI systems
An aggregator-based model simply can’t meet these expectations today. Shifting to an API-first stack is no longer a “nice to have”, it’s essential for keeping up with search engine expectations, customer demands, and modern technical requirements.
Aggregators once played a critical role in the evolution of local SEO, but they’re now being overtaken by more precise, transparent, and scalable technologies. For SaaS providers managing multi-location brands, building around direct API integrations and rejecting outdated batch models is key to staying competitive.
If you still rely on aggregators as your primary listings strategy it’s time to evolve.
Ready to take control of your local listings at scale?
Explore our Listings API designed specifically for SaaS providers managing multi-location businesses. Real-time updates, publisher-specific formatting, and powerful reporting—all from a single source.
👉 Schedule a demo or request access to our sandbox to start building today.